About Me

Name: Brandon O'Neal...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Rush Limbaugh
Citizens Against Government Waste
Glenn Beck

Liberals using Arizona shooting as a political opportunity

January the 8th, 2011 will be a day that will be remembered as the day that America's core was shaken to the bone. It will be a day remembered as one of sorrow and of great pain for not only Arizona residents, but for the entire nation. It was on that day, the 8th of January , when a crazed lunatic named Jared Loughner put into action all of his deranged and maniacal beliefs. His victims totaled more than a dozen. Included in those victims were the deaths of six innocent Americans who were simply participating in America's democracy. Among the dozen that were injured was Gabrielle Giffords, a member of the House of Representatives from Arizona who was shot in the head at near point blank range. Just reading the facts above paints a picture of carnage and destruction that should cause all Americans agony. However, listening to the political posturing that started taking place a mere thirty minutes, yes you read that correctly, thirty minutes after this deadly attack will make you want to turn your television off forever. The liberal elite in this country has always tried to capitalize on a crises. Just listening to Rahm Emanuel when he said that you "never want a crises to go to waste" reveals the liberals for what they are; political opportunists. Almost immediately after the attack the liberals went on the offensive, blaming Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh for their "hate speech." These left wingers actually believe that the words coming from Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh could actually incite a person to go on  a shooting spree that included the death of a nine year old girl. The liberal attack was being presented to the American public with absolutely no proof that there was any link between Loughner and talk radio. In fact, just today  Good Morning America aired an interview with Jared Loughner's best friend in high school. During the interview, Zach Osler said of Jared Loughner that "He did not watch tv. He disliked the news. He didn't listen to political radio. He didn't take sides. He wasn't on the left. He wasn't on the right." After reading this interview I knew I had two choices to choose from. I could believe the liberal politicians who were trying to paint Jared Loughner as a right wing extremist, using absolutely no facts to back up their claim or I could believe Jared Loughner's best friend who said that Jared paid no attention to politics. Do I really need to explain my choice? Didn't think so! You see, America, what is happening here is an attempt by the liberal politicians to ram through another part of their agenda, the fairness doctrine, during a time of crises. One theme that keeps popping up throughout history when you read about the progressives is the fact that the only time they ever achieve legislative success is during a crises. World War II resulted in the progressive income tax. The Great Depression led to FDR's plethora of social programs, and the liberals will try to use the acts of a lone madman to justify controlling the airwaves. Are they trying to do this to make you safer? Are they attacking conservatives because they actually think that is who is to blame for this atrocity? I hope you don't need my help in answering that question. They do it because a nation in turmoil is the only type of nation that will go along with the progressive's utopian ideology. Comparing this massacre with the murderous actions of Nidal Hassan will reveal the liberlas for the hypocritical ideologues that they are.  Immediately after he shot and killed 13 and wounded thirty, the liberals were telling American's not to jump to conclusions. They argued that Hassan, a muslim, did not represent all Muslims or the entire Muslim religion. On that point, I agree with the liberals. Fast forward to January the 8th, 2011 however, and the liberals are jumping to conclusions and trying to pin all of Jared Loughner's destruction on an entire conservative group of Americans. They have once again decided to take the immoral route in trying to administer another shot of progressive policy to the American body. This is not the first time they have tried this tactic, Bill Clinton tried the same thing in the wake of the Timothy McVeigh bombing, and it won't be the last time either. That being said, this progressive tactic of exploiting a crises for political points gets even more disturbing and embarrassing for America every time it happens. To all of the liberals exploiting this tragic event I say sleep well tonight and rest assured knowing that America is praying for your forgiveness. The American people will find a way to comfort the victims and their families and will implement a positive change within themselves to propel our nation forward. The question is, will you?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tax cut extension a sign that times have not changed

Most conservatives will love it and most liberals will hate it! The average American will probably never notice it and our future generations will pay the price for it! What single recent event could cause such a diverse response from Americans of all backgrounds and ideologies? The recent tax cut bill that Barack Obama signed, that's what. While I do applaud President Obama for signing a tax cut extension into law, there is an uderlying issue that always gets overlooked by the American people as a whole. The issue also gets overlooked on every possible occasion by those fine men and women that we have elected to represent us. The overlooked issue at hand? Government spending! While I do believe that tax cuts are a vital piece of a successful economic plan, it is still only one piece that must be accompanied by another vital piece in order to create a prosperous and growing economy. That second, neglected piece of the puzzle is a cut in government spending. I guess I will never fully understand those people who do not get the fact that we cannot spend ourselves into prosperity. We must, as American citizens, demand that our representatives work together to decrease the economic hole they are digging us every time they spend our hard earned money!! To many people, this tax cut extension is a sign that things are finally changing. They see it as a sign that the democrats have finally heard the message that the American people sent to them, via the ballot box, on November the 2nd. To me? I see it as the complete opposite. I see this tax extension as a sign that things have not changed a bit. Our politicians still see the success of our economy and the security of our country as being directly attached to the tax rates that we pay. While this is partly true, well, it's only PARTLY TRUE! The American people didn't elect a group of new representatives simply because they wanted the Bush tax cuts to be extended. Instead, we elected new leaders because we wanted to break our governments addiction to spending money. How did our little "intervention" work? Our leaders, albeit not the new ones yet, coupled this tax cut extension with an increase in federal spending. I guess it's like trying to stop smoking. If we, as Americans, believe that just because we switched brands that we are no longer addicted, then we are sorely mistaken. We must stop spending so recklessly or we will pay the price. We will pay that price through massive inflation, which is coming soon to a store near you, and we will have nobody to blame but ourselves! Well, and those incompetent politicians that "speak for us!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The final piece of the total government control puzzle

" We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America." Those words were spoken by President elect Barack Obama shortly before being sworn in as the forty-fourth President of the United States. To many people, these were the words that they had been longing to hear. They wanted a new America, or so they thought! Not only did Barack Obama deliver on his promise to change our country, but he is very close to putting into place the last piece of his socialist, communistic ideological puzzle. Think this sounds crazy? Consider the "fundamental" changes already put into place and then imagine what will happen when the last piece falls into place.

1. Barack Obama has fundamentally changed the financial industry. Consider the role that the federal government plays in our financial lives as of today. Want a student loan? Uncle Sam is the only one authorized to give it to you. This change they passed as part of the health care bill! http://http://oudaily.com/news/2010/mar/31/health-care-bill-strips-student-loans-private-lend/ Aside from the student loan hijacking, many banks fell victim to the government as a provider scam when they accepted bailouts from the federal government in exchange for complying with new federal regulations. What happened to the banks who didn't want federal funds? Uncle Sam responded by telling the banks that they would take the money or they would see their banks downgraded by the feds. Control of the financial industry? Check!

2. Barack Obama has fundamentally transformed the way the government interacts with the manufacturing industry. Need we look any further than GM? The money that the government "loaned" to GM came with a very hefty price tag for GM. The government would have the power to regulate the salaries of top ranking officials of the company and even forced one to resign. Rick Wagoner was asked by the Obama administration to resign and Wagoner obliged. Forcing the CEO of a private sector company to quit his job as the CEO was clearly a power move designed to send a message that the government made all the decisions for GM now, not Rick Wagoner! As always, taking money from the government also meant taking orders from them, a classic Chicago style beat down by Chicago thugs themselves! The government also tried to convince Ford that they could not survive without relying on the government, but Ford declined to succumb to the hypnotic chant of Obama and his cronies. How did Ford do? They only made 1.7 billion dollars of profit in the third quarter of 2010, a 69% increase over the same period last year.http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/27/business/la-fi-1027-autos-ford-20101027 Oh, I guess success can be had by relying on entrepreneurs and not the government! Oops.

3. Fundamentally transforming the governments role in providing health care? Check! You know, this is the bill that Nancy Pelosi said we had to pass to find out what was in it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To This bill has absolutely nothing to do with providing health care to all Americans but has everything to do with squeezing the private industry out of the health care coverage business. You see, once the government has no competition when it comes to selling us health care, every single one of us is dependent on them! That, in essence, is the ultimate goal of this socialist, Marxist regime. They want all of us to crawl to the government for everything, and health care would entrap all of us, everyone!

So, there you have it. Three areas of society that our government has seized control of in just the past two years! But, as if that is not bad enough, there is one more piece of the puzzle that is about ready to fall into place, total control of the media. The recent wikileaks headlines has captivated the attention of most of America. The story looks a little different if you look at it through the lens of a revolutionary, however. Former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, has been quoted as saying that "You never want a serious crises to go to waste." http://http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122721278056345271.html Most people would say that the leaking of Americas secrets on a website would qualify as a serious crises, but what would Emanuel and Obama propose that we do about it so as not to waste the opportunity? Two words; Net Neutrality. This bill, which will be introduced in the house of Representative very shortly, will give phone and cable companies the power to decide what you can and cannot see on the internet. http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality_letter.htmlOh, well that's just great, isn't it? You see, Net Neutrality is not a response to wikileaks, as they will try to make you believe. No, no, wikileaks is simply the crises that the government will not want  to waste in order to push net neutrality, the final piece of the total government control puzzle into place. And then, it will be over. They will control our finances, our manufacturing, our health care and our media. I hope, for your sake, that you are on good speaking terms with Uncle Sam. I have a feeling that you'll be talking to him about a lot of things soon. Or most probably, he will be talking to you!



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The truth about our national debt!

We have all heard the argument hundreds of times; the government spends too much money. For most people, agreement follows, but knowledge of the massive depth of the problem is not realized. Most people come to the conclusion that any money they get from the government is justified but that any money spent on other people or programs is wasteful government spending. For the sake of this article, we will ignore the individual recipients’ point of view and look at the problem from a much broader range. I hope that you are sitting down as you read this article, because the numbers are downright horrifying! The following is a list of things that, if not corrected, will lead to the destruction of the freedom that we have come to take for granted.

1. Our MONTHLY interest payment on our nation debt is $31.9 billion. The ANNUAL budget for the department of education is $46.8 billion, the department of urban housing and development is $43.6 billion and the annual budget for the department of homeland security is $42.6 billion. Having a monthly interest payment that exceeds the annual cost of running three critical government programs is a path to ruin!

2. In 1916, the entire national debt could have been paid off by the richest man in the country at that time, John D. Rockefeller. Today, if Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, the two richest men, combined all of their money, they couldn't even pay three months of interest on our debt!

3. Of all the spending the government does, which totals $3.8 TRILLION, we have enough money to fund social security, national defense and Medicare! All other government programs such as education, veterans benefits, health care (about to get a much bigger piece of the pie,) transportation, international affairs, agriculture and natural resources all have to be funded by borrowing money, EVERY OTHER GOVERNMENT PROGRAM!! Read this paragraph again and then try to tell me that everything is going to be just fine!  The fact that we only have enough money to fund three government programs should make you tremble with fear.

4. Forty-two cents of every dollar that is spent by the federal government in 2010 will have been borrowed! Try running your personal finances that way and see what happens!

5. At our current rate of spending, net interest payments on our debt will amount to a full eight percent of our GDP, which will make interest payments that largest expenditure in our federal budget! We will spend more money enriching our creditors (mostly foreign countries that want us to fail,) than will be spent on American programs and or people! Still think everything is fine? Can you imagine a situation in which your monthly credit card interest payments were more than your monthly mortgage payment? I didn't think so!

America, we must change our reckless ways! It is time to be honest with ourselves and tell the government to stop spending at its current pace. We, however, must be willing to sacrifice ourselves. Are you willing to take a cut in your entitlement payments? Are you willing to work a few more years before collecting social security? Are you willing to stop your dependence on the government for your survival and instead take control of your own destiny? If so, great! We need more people like you to step up and speak loud enough that the government hears you! If you answered no, I am sorry but you are part of the problem. I know that is probably hard to hear, but someone has to say it! To get this thing corrected and to preserve the freedom that we all enjoy, we have to accept cuts to our favorite programs. It's not just money spent on other people that is causing this painful and nearly irreversible mess. It's everybody's program, and yes, that includes yours!





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You saw the results!

Now that the midterm election is in the rear view mirror, we have time to take a breath and interpret the results. On the surface, it seems as if President Obama, as well as the media, still do not get it! As a typical American who is doing his best to raise a family and succeed in his career, I feel as though I have a pretty good understanding of what the election was all about.

1. The American people were sick and tired of being used to perpetuate the power struggle that is going on in Washington. We are tired of the politicians, from both sides of the aisle, trying to buy our votes with "stimulus" dollars, handouts and bribes. We were tired of being in the middle of a tug of war to see which party could generate more votes by shelling out the most free money (which they had to borrow!)We want our government to work and to treat it's citizens like the educated people that they are. We can be bought no longer. Show us results or we will show you the door!

2. The American people were sick and tired of our government borrowing money so that we can live beyond our means. If Washington decides to spend money on a new government program, we expect them to cut the same amount of funds from the general budget. It's a pretty simple concept that most of us learned in junior high economics classes! Just tell us the truth! If we can't afford something, tell us! We are mature people and can handle the truth. It is, after all, the only thing that will give us hope!

3. The American people were sick and tired of politicians treating us as if we were too stupid to know what is best for the country. Our country was founded upon a set of principles that are pretty easy to understand; minimum government equals maximum freedom! We get it Washington, we get it!

4. The American people were sick and tired of our government being apologetic for America. We are the greatest country in the history of the world. We are the most charitable, the most entrepreneurial, the most compassionate and the most sincere nation in history. If other countries don't like us, so be it! Our politicians represent United States citizens, not the rest of the world!

5. The American people were sick and tired of being sick and tired. The game has went on too long. We let our politicians get away with things much too long. That all changed, however, on November 2nd, 2010, when America spoke loud enough for all to hear. We said "You're fired," to those politicians who have betrayed the American citizens and who have saddled us with more debt than we can handle. No doubt, we will feel the effects of their incompetence for a long time to come, but we have finally turned the page.

November the 3rd, 2010, marked a point in history where the American people said enough is enough and decided to, once again, lead the rest of the world on a journey that will reshape humanity and spark the fire that is freedom. Fear not world, the American people are ready to lead again! We will be that beacon of light that will illuminate the path for generations to come! We will lead the way because we are Americans and we finally got our country back! We did not get it back by relying on government subsidies or by ordering those healthy apple dippers with our big macs as Michelle Obama has proposed. No, we got our country back by finally standing up for our principles that has made us the greatest nation on earth! We got it back by looking at our current state of government and saying, we can do better. We got it back by following the advice in the Declaration of Independence that says "whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it." Abolish it we did not, but alter it? You saw the results!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our new but old idea

I get very angry whenever I hear the liberals and progressives of this country say that the problem with the conservative movement is that they have no new ideas on how to fix what ails this country. Our problems, they say can only be solved by thinking of new ways to govern our nation. To them I say;

On May 25, 1787, a convention convened, presided over by George Washington, to establish the framework for our new nation's government. Although many heated debates took place, and at time many differing views were presented, the final product of this convention  was a document called the Constitution of the United States. Followed correctly, this document would provide the freedom and liberty needed to sustain our country as the most prosperous and free people this world had ever seen. The Constitution said that the federal government should be limited in what it can do when it said that  any power not delegated to the federal government nor prohibited to it by the states was reserved solely to the states. Under this Constitution, the federal government was to regulate the protection of the nation as a whole and also govern the nation's foreign affairs. Any issue that was a state specific issue was to be dealt with by the people residing in that state. This idea of local-self government would ensure that the individual states could make decisions that would positively impact their personal situation. Today, however, this local self government idea has been replaced by the idea that the federal government is smarter than we are. That they are the ones who should make decisions for the states. That they are the ones who should ensure equality, not of opportunity but of outcomes. The idea of the federal government bailing out states who are in financial trouble cannot be found in our greatest document. Our current situation of centralized power in the federal government is exactly what the Constitution was trying to prevent from ever happening. Period. So, to all of you who say that the problem with the conservative movement is that they have no new ideas to fix things, I say you are correct and incorrect at the same time. Our ideas were penned in 1787 during the Constitution Convention, so our ideas are old. However, following the Constitution, which we are advocating, would be a very new idea that we haven't tried in the last 100 or so years. Our problem lies in the fact that we think we are smarter people than those who wrote our founding documents and my what a big problem that is!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An open letter to Brad Ellsworth

Dear Mr. Ellsworth;
We need to start off by telling you that we are sorry for many things that have ocured in this country within the past two years. We are sorry that unemployment is so high. We are sorry that employees are feeling left out in the cold when it comes to bail outs and bribes. We are sorry  about the mounting federal debt that we are amassing, which will lead to the next generation of Americans (our children) spending their entire lives working to pay off what we have recklessly spent. We are, at last, sorry that you played a critical role in all of these issues while serving as a representative for the people that you so arrogantly ignored.

Our apology for the high rate of unemployment is real. It is horrible watching small businesses go bankrupt and terminate the employment of their employees. Equally real is the fact that, at no time, did you stand up for small business while a member of the House of Representatives. In fact, you have been quoted as supporting the card check legislation, which will make it easier for employees to unionize, which will further cripple business in this country. Can you, Mr. Ellsworth, name one union that has made a positive impact on business in the last twenty- five years? How did they do with GM / Ford? Must the working men and women (the taxpayers) continue to fund labor union bailouts through your multi billion dollar "stimulus" packages? Common sense tells us that what makes business more profitable will ultimately lead to more jobs, Mr. Ellsworth, not less of them.

We could almost cry when we tell our children that we are sorry for the debt we are leaving them to deal with. Our current rate of federal spending is so huge, so unimagineable, that it is almost too hard to comprehend. You, Mr. Ellsworth, did a fantastic job of helping this disaster take form when you voted in favor of Obama-Pelosi care. Your democratic party took a program designed to destroy the health care industry and wrapped it up in a package so it would look like a genuine humanitarian effort. Your efforts on health care mirror your efforst on small business destruction. Health care was passed for one reason and one reason only, control. Buy the health care that the federal government wants you to buy or go to jail. Work forty hours a week and still can't affor the coverage they tell you to buy? If so, you have two options. 1. Let the government subsidize it, thereby giving Washington even more control over you life or 2. Go to jail. Sound neat, huh?

Mr. Ellsworth, the commercial you ran last month said that you were proud of being a sheriff for so many years. You go on to say that "they" were spending money to recklessly and that the voters of Indiana needed to do something about "them." Well, Mr Ellworth, we have finally came to a topic that we can agree with you on. We do need to do something about those reckless congressmen and senators, and on November the second we will. We wish you well in any of your future endeavors and we hope that you find a spot in your local unemployment line. You might want to bring a chair and a sack lunch. We've heard that the lines are long.

Sincerely yours,
The voters of Indiana
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Transparent as mud

The latest chapter in the demolition of our freedoms, as Americans, has officially been written. Thanks in large part, no in total part, to the democrat controlled congress and our "transparent" President, American citizens can no longer gain access to the Securities and Exchange Commission information via the Freedom of Information Act. Besides the blatant failure to live up to yet another campaign promise, Mr. Obama has just set the stage for another government agency to do what they want to who they want without American citizens being privy to the information that was used. Just a little information on the SEC and what they do. Their mission statement provided on sec.gov states that the commission's mission is to protect the investors, maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets and to facilitate capital formation. This is almost too easy. Did they protect investors in regard to Enron? How have they been doing lately when it comes to capital formation? Two words about their maintaining fair and orderly markets: Fannie and Freddie. That's right, the SEC is just another example of a government agency that contributes more to the problem than to the solution that they were created for. And now, thanks to this financial "reform," we have no way of obtaining any information from them. Thanks Mr. Obama for all the transparency you promised us. Their official site goes on to say that "Crucial to the SEC's effectiveness in each of these areas is its enforcement authority. Each year the SEC brings hundreds of civil enforcement actions against individuals and companies for violation of securities laws." Well, that sounds great doesn't it? Not only does the SEC determine if you've broken one of their rules, but they also get to punish you without a warrant and without a trial. The fact that people aren't up in arms about this speaks volumes as to the level that the American public has sunk when it comes to standing up for our rights as Americans. Why, after all, should the government be worried about Americans requesting the information that was used by the SEC to determine a rule was broken? Unless, of course, they do not want us to see the intimidation and retaliation against political foes that will surely become one of their tactics. Own a small business? If so, the SEC can now march into your life and close your business down and you have no way of obtaining the information they used so that you may adequately defend yourself. This is just another step by the Obama administration of making sure that each and every business is under the thumb of the federal government. The fact that this "government" of ours is so willing to prevent information from getting to the American public is scary. Freedom is not the norm people, it is the exception. As Americans, we must stand up to defend this freedom and to make sure that we are able to pass it off to our kids and grand kids. Watching the government trample over our rights while we sit back and do little or nothing about it makes me sick to my stomach. How anybody can look themselves in the mirror and tell themselves that this is the path America should be taking is beyond me. It does, however, make it very easy to sum up the administrations actions as well as the people that defend this group of crooks. Despicable and anti American. To all of the business owners out there that have been stomped on by the muddy boots of our federal government, thank you for creating jobs for our citizens. Thank you for funding, via taxes, the public sector and sorry that no politician we have elected to represent us has the guts to tell the world what is wrong with our corrupt system.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The American people are interested in words Mr. Obama

I am not going to question the severity of the BP oil crisis. I know, as we all do, that this oil spill will have potentially catastrophic consequences on parts of our aquatic environment. However, some recent statements from our Commander in Chief have me questioning his line of thinking. In an interview with Matt Lauer, Mr. Obama was asked if he has "spoken directly with the CEO of BP?" Barack responded by saying "I have not spoken to him directly and here's the reason, because my experience is, when you talk to a guy like the BP CEO, he's going to say all the right things to me. I'm not interested in words." Just looking at this conversation from a distance, a red flag should raise in front of you immediately. We hire the President to make decisions in a time of crisis. We pay him to solve problems. It seems logical to me that if a company is involved in a catastrophe that will affect millions of people in our country, our President should be in direct communication with the CEO of that company. When the banks were in trouble, Barack had no problem holding summits with the folks in charge. During the presidential campaign, Barack was intent on sitting down with Hugo Chavez who has seized control of Venezuelan media so that all messages consumed by the Venezuelan people are state controlled. Chavez has also been quoted as calling the United States the "devil." Sit down with the BP CEO? No way! Sit down with Hugo Chavez, dictator of Venezuela? Anytime buddy! Another name on Barack Obama's campaign list of people he wanted to sit down with was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. You know him as the guy who denies the Holocaust and who said that the attacks on 9-11 were a "big fabrication." Chavez and Ahmadinejad represent a part of the world that wants to see the American way of life destroyed. They want a New World order in which no country assumes the role of the super power. The BP CEO represents a company that is in the middle of an environmental disaster that we need to remedy and remedy quick. Common sense tells us that the President of the United States should have sat down with BP immediately. It seems to me that maybe, just maybe, Obama seems more comfortable with dictators that denounce the United States than he does with CEO's of private companies that make up our capitalistic society. During the Matt Lauer interview, Barack said that he was not "interested in words." The bad news for him is that the American people are interested in the words of people running for office. We have heard you Barack Obama. We have heard your words and will vote accordingly in the 2012 presidential election. The good news for you is that you will have plenty of free time to attend tea parties with Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Bottoms up sir!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Call them their official name

We will begin this discussion with the definition of fraud. Fraud is defined as intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual. I ask you to keep that definition in mind as we delve into the Obama administration's campaign promises and the actions that the administration has taken since the election. Barack Obama mesmerized the voters in the 2008 presidential campaign. He promised us "change," although we never asked him to explain what he meant. We listened to his promises of a better government and believed him when he made the following promises.
   First, Barack Obama promised us that he would allow the American public an opportunity to read any non-emergency bill via the internet for five days before he signed the bill into law. On the surface, this seemed like a great idea. What a better way to make the government more transparent and accountable to the American people. We believed Barack Obama when he made this promise to us. Barack was quoted as saying, "When there is a  bill that ends up on my desk as the president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it." I guess that on January twentieth, President Obama no longer felt like being so transparent. It was on that date that Barack Obama signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act. At the time of the signing, the bill had been on the president's desk for two days and not the five days that we were promised. Deception? You better believe it was! Again, on February seventeenth, Obama signed into law the $787 billion dollar stimulus package one day after it passed through Congress. Five days Mr. President? I think not! Deception? Check!
   Secondly, we were promised ear mark reform. Mr. Obama was quoted as saying, "We need earmark reform. And when I am president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely." That promise was made well before the president signed into law the $410 billion omnibus bill of 2009. How many earmarks did that bill contain? Only 9,000 earmarks totaling $7.7 billion. Was Mr. Obama honest when he made his earmark reform promise on the campaign trail? The nays have it!
   Thirdly, we were told that under an Obama administration, we would "remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within sixteen months." That promise was made on Barack's campaign website during his presidential campaign. However, on February twenty-seventh, Obama changed course. His new stance was "Let me say this as plainly as I can. By August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." To his credit, Mr. Obama only misled the American voters by nine months. Honest campaign promise? Nope!
   Another broken promise was made when candidate Obama criticized President Bush for issuing signing statements, which add interpretation and instructions on how to carry out the newly signed law. Obama was quoted as saying, "That's not part of the presidents power." He went further on March ninth by issuing a memorandum negating Bush's signing statements. However, two days later, President Obama attached his first signing statement to the aforementioned $410 billion omnibus bill. But Mr. Obama, I thought during the campaign you told us that signing statements were not part of the president's power.
   The point here is this. We were made alot of promises by candidate Obama during the campaign. For the most part, the American people believed these promises that were made to them. The problem was, candidate Obama didn't believe the promises that he was making. Nonetheless, promises kept pouring out the administration nearly every day. Were the promises made in good faith, or were they made to get candidate Obama elected? I hope, by now, you know the answer to that question. Many people call Obama a socialist or unpatriotic or even a liar. I however, like to refer to official definitions whenever possible. Intentional deception (campaign promises) made for personal gain (being elected president of the United States). America, we have been duped. The current administration, by definition, is a fraud!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We still control this country

Up until November the 18th, all seemd like it had been lost. The government was moving ahead with national health care, like it or not. Our politicians, as often happens under liberal leadership, thought that the American people were somehow unable to make informed decisions on matters that affected their own lives. We were made to look like inept pieces of the socialism puzzle that the Obama administration was trying to put together. When the pieces of the puzzle didn't fit nice and neat, the administration simply bent the corners (the special deal given to Nebraska for the support of their Senator Ben Nelson on the issue of national health care) and pushed a little harder to ensure that each piece was in place. To the average American citizen such as myself, it seemed like there was nothing more we could do. No matter how obvious it was that the American people were against this monstrosity of a bill, it was just as obvious that our government would do what they wanted to anyway. The old adage of one person can make a difference seemed like a distant memory of a country that we were leaving behind. But then something funny happened. The calander flipped to November the 19th, the day of the special Senate election in Massachusetts. The Democratic candidate represented everything the current administration stood for. Higher taxes, less individual control, bigger government and socialistic health care. The people of the United States were against her but Barack Obama was giving speeches on her behalf. Obama wins, right? Not so fast. The Republican candidate, Scott Brown, had something that the Democrats did not have; common sense. Scott Brown ran a campaign that focused on the things that Americans value. Individual responsibility, lower taxes, smaller government and a tough stance when it comes to terrorism highlighted Scott Brown's agenda and struck a chord with Americans. Trailing Coakley by thrity points with a month to go, Scott Brown kept his nose to the grind and beat Coakley by five points in a state that had elected Ted Kennedy to the Senate for forty-six years. Immediately after the election, the Democrats were jumping off of the national health care boat like it was a sinking ship. If those same Democrats had listened to the American people in the first place, they would realize that the health care ship is already sitting on the bottom of the ocean. With the special election for one Senate seat, I realized something big. The American people were still alive. One person with common sense solutions can still make a difference. With that being said, we must stay vigilant. The Obama administration will try to make it look like it is their idea to slow down national health care. They will try to fool us into believing that they have seen the light. We will know better though. Not because we are college professors or members of the media, not becuase we are multi millionaire businessmen. We will know better because we are Americans, and when push comes to shove, we still control this country.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will we yield to them?

When is enough finally enough? I am sick and tired of the march we are making towards socialism! Sooner or later, as American citizens, we have to be honest with ourselves, even if that means admitting things that make us feel vulnerable. I urge you to take a look at the current national debt. America, we are broke beyond broke. We cannot afford our current social security system, our broken Medicare and Medicaid system, or our wasteful spending to bail out companies that make horrible business decisions. Any logical thinking American would admit that the way we handle money at the federal level would never work in our own households.Sooner or later the bill collector comes knocking at the front door. However, with the understanding that we are broke, we are on the verge of giving the government control of our health care system. It almost feels like a bad dream. Are we, the American citizens, that ignorant? Do we really believe that more government control of our lives, especially regarding control that involves money, is the smart thing to do? I would surely hope not. Our current political class is living in a land of make believe. They vote at the feet of special interests. They listen to their constituents only when the ideas of the politician and citizen are alike. They lie to us, believing that we are incapable of thinking for ourselves. November of 2010 is, without doubt, the election in which we will make our choice. Will we choose the free enterprise, capitalistic system that generates the most wealth for the most people? The same system that values individual choice and responsibility over bureaucratic control? Or will we choose the socialistic system that has lead most of Europe down the road to tyranny? That system is the same system that values the group over the individual. It is hard to grasp the fact that we may be living in the final days of the American system that we have come to love. We are giving our freedoms away to a group of politicians that cannot understand a budget, cannot figure out how to make money running Amtrak and that cannot get you through the line at the DMV in less than two hours. These are the people that we are on the verge of giving power over our healthcare to? Wake up America, we are not that stupid! A quote from Thomas Jefferson offers some insight into our current predicament. He said that "The natural progress is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." The government is gaining ground, America. The question is, will we yield to them? God help us if we do!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No pain no gain

The nation is waking up, finally! Our two year hibernation as a nation is over and we are starting to get hungry again. The funny thing is that the country wants "CHANGE," again. Isn't it funny that Barack Obama's promise of change has made the nation hungrier for change than it has ever been? A recent Gallup poll, conducted from November the 5th through the 8th showed that forty-eight percent of those polled said that if the Congressional elections were held today they would vote for the Republican candidate. Forty-four percent said that they would vote for the Democrat. Taking it a step further, independent voters, the ones that usually decide an election, would choose the Republican over the Democrat by a fifty-two percent to thirty percent margin. A difference of twenty-two percent among independents! And, despite the billions of dollars that Obama has wasted on the economy, the number one reason for the strong Republican support? The economy! Why is the Republican support such a positive sign this far from the elections? A quick look at last years poll reveals the reason for optimism. Last April, the same poll revealed that the Democrats enjoyed a thirteen point lead over the Republicans during the House congressional elections. The winds of change are blowing hard, America, and we must capitalize on it. We must not sit back on our laurels and enjoy what seems to be an imminent victory. Instead, we must forge ahead and continue to expose the corrupt, socialist fraud that has hijacked our nation. We must continue to educate our friends, family and neighbors to make sure that this type of hysteria does not happen again. We must, never again, accept the fact that certain media outlets do not require answers to questions that must be asked prior to the American people voting for a politician. Barack Obama promised us change, and in doing so, he did not lie. He is trying to change the country alright, but thank God the American people are largely resisting the change. I think, maybe naively, that the American people have realized the change that they need. It's not a change of our fundamental beliefs or ideology, but rather a change of the lunatics that are running our country. We have paid a price for our ignorance of the past several years. In fact, we may pay an even bigger price before the next election cycle rolls around. But, as the old saying goes, no pain no gain, right? A long term conservative movement that brings our country back to where the founders intended it to be would be well worth the circus that we have had to endure for the past year! When the 2010 congressional elections roll around, if all goes as planned, we will all owe the Obama- Pelosi extreme regime a genuine thank you for awaking the American people. Although we, as a nation, may not have the greenest grass in the neighborhood, it is still the yard with the least amount of dog crap in it!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does this guy understand his job description?

The point of this article is simple. I want an explanation. Sounds pretty simple doesn't it? I do not want to argue, here, just give two stories and ask for an explanation of President Obama's comments.
      James Crowley, a police academy expert on racial profiling, responds to a home burglary call. Upon arrival at the house, Sergeant Crowley carefully walks up to the front door, thinking that he is on the doorstep of a house that is hiding a criminal. Did Sergeant Crowley drive to this house just because he needed something to pass the time? Of course not! He drove to this house and walked to the door because a neighbor called the police to report a burglary. Sergeant Crowley was honoring his call of duty. When Henry Gates showed up at the front door, Sergeant Crowley asked to see his identification. Gates refused. Sergeant Crowley asked Mr. Gates to step outside so that the two of them could talk. How did Gates respond? By telling the officer that he would "Talk to your mamma outside." Probably something that a rational human being would not say to a police officer. Crowley arrested Gates for disorderly conduct, part of which was because of the refusal to show his identification. Any normal person would agree that Sergeant Crowley did not do anything out of line. He responded to a call from a neighbor, walked to the door, was approached by an irrational man and was forced to arrest this person because of their eratic behavior. Mr. Crowley was doing his job. However, "President" Obama disagrees. He said, and I quote, ""I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry," he went on to say that "Number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home." Mr. Obama, you see, jumped to a conclusion. He was not there the night of the incident, but he still felt the need to interject his own personal feelings and beliefs.
      Story number two is a recent happening. Fort Hood Texas is the home of  an Army military base. Last week, an Army psychiatrist by the name of  Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire, killing 13 American soldiers and civilians and wounded 29 others. The shooter was a Muslim who had openly criticized the United States and had, according to the CIA, tried to reach out to individuals associted with Al Qaeda. Hasan expressed, openly, that he thought suicide bombers were justified in their actions. A mentally sane person would surely come to the conclusion that an American hating individual should not be allowed into any branch of the military. In fact, if you hate America, you should not even be allowed to stay in the country. Don't like it here? Leave! A sane American would draw the conclusion that trying to reach out to Al Qaeda just weeks before you shoot to death 13 people and wound 29 others on a military base would, in fact, be a terrorist attack. However, President Obama disagrees. Just the other day, President Obama said that American's should not "jump to conclusions." What? Are you kidding me? The commander in Chief, you know, the man IN CHARGE of the Army says that Americans should not jump to conclusions about an American hating murderer who killed 13 troops and nearly killed another 29? Is this really where we are at as a nation? Have we really reached a point where our leader, the President of the United States, can criticize a police sergeant for doing their job and even call the police department "stupid," but won't let the American people jump to the conclusion that says a man with hatred for America in their heart that kills 13 troops on a military base is a terrorist? Do we really value the feelings of those with violence against America as their goal above honest American's just trying to do their jobs? For this, I would like an educated explanation. I have a feeling that I will be waiting for awhile. To you I say, answer me please. To "President" Obama I say wow, you never cease to suprise me with your ignorant arrogance and stupidity. To the families of those who lost a loved one at Fort Hood last week, America mourns your loss. We are sorry for what you have endured and are sorry for the embarassment the President has bestowed upon you and America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alone at the gate

I just don't understand it. Why is it that every time the government tries to get involved in something they have to go against everything that the majority of Americans stand for? Why is it that the national consensus only matters if the national consensus agrees with the particular government intervention that is being called for? Take the issue of national health care. Tucked deep inside of this bill, page 110 of section 222 to be exact, there is a clause that states abortion will be allowed under the proposed government run health care plan. Did you know that? Whether you agree with the right to an abortion or not will not be argued here. There is an underlying issue that must be brought into the light of day. I know, I know, our politicians aren't used to doing things in the daylight where everyone can see what's happening, but bear with me for a moment. Under this Pelosi backed bill, everyone who is enrolled in the government health care plan, and we all know that eventually everyone will be financially forced into it through unbearable tax rates on private policies, everyone will pay an abortion premium! Don't believe me? Think I am some crazy right wing zealot? Read page 96, line 16, section 213. It's right there for all to see. The problem is nobody's looking!! Everytime that an individual sends a check to good ol' Uncle Sam for their health care premiums, the government sets aside a portion of that premium for abortions. That absolutely makes my stomach churn!! By doing this, the government is telling you that they do not care about your individual ideology or morals. They don't care if you think that abortion is a sin or immoral, you are still going to fund it via your tax dollars. This is a perfect example of why we have got to make sure that government stays as far away from our personal lives as possible. As citizens of the United States, we do enough to damage our moral standing in the world. Do we really need the governments help in that arena? I think not. When it boils right down to it, I would rather quit my job and live under the nearest overpass, as long as there is an IHOP nearby, than send my tax dollars to Uncle Sam so that he can help pay for something that I find to be unacceptable. Read the bill people, and call your Senators and Representatives! You will realize, when you take the time to read it, that you are being asked to pay for things that you alone will have to answer for later, and the government will not be standing at that gate with you!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »